[elt0n]

FR on Far (Mansion)

Location: Central hotel (Not within walking distance of mrt)
Looks: 40% discount (picture is photoshopped). Girl does not look ugly but definitely a huge discount over the picture advertised. The girl said she is 25 years of age instead of 20 years advertised.
Body (6/10): Skin tone a lot darker than photo. Mina tan, definitely not PRC fair. Full back tattoo and one small tattoo on the front. The girl shows signs of childbirth - saggy and wrinkled tummy. Normal skin texture (not tofu smooth).
Boobs (6/10): Full B+ cup instead D cup advertised. Natural soft but saggy and nipples are dark. Overall not an appealing sight.
Smell (3/10): Girl has slight body odour and bad breadth that was a turn off.
Bj (5/10): I didn’t do bbbj. Bj lacked suction and tongue action. Unable to deep throat.
Catbath (4/10): Could feel the teeth and she was biting lightly on my nipples which I don’t personally enjoy. Feedback to the girl and she just licked gently. Does not lick entire body. Hence, wasn’t exactly a cat bath.
Hj (7/10): Standard hj with KY. Not bad but not outstanding either.
Fj: wouldn’t comment on this as I 2 minutes of cowgirl but could not concentrate with the condition of her boobs and wrinkled tummy, so switched to hj instead.
Okt: Booking was prompt but okt is not transparent in his advertisement. The girl was advertised to perform cim and during booking, okt confirmed that girl does cof. Reality is that cim is not offered and girl wanted extra money for cof (which okt did not mention when I specifically asked during booking. I didn’t go ahead with cof). I asked the girl why was cim advertised when she is unwilling to perform and she mentioned that she told okt that she does not do cim but okt misrepresented it in the advertisement. Feedback was provided to okt at the end of the booking but he did not reply.
Rtf: No, due to the quality of the girl. Also don’t recommend patronising this stable due to the lack of transparency and intentional misrepresentation by okt.