View Single Post
  #21806  
Old 28-05-2014, 09:44 AM
nookie2612 nookie2612 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 609
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 249 / Power: 13
nookie2612 is a Helpful and Caring Samsternookie2612 is a Helpful and Caring Samsternookie2612 is a Helpful and Caring Samster
Re: Bangkok Field Report

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsk721g View Post
To add-on, extract of MFA quote below is fxxking BS:-

"Singaporeans who are travelling to Thailand should exercise a high degree of caution and take all necessary precautions for personal safety, including purchasing comprehensive travel and medical insurance."

I should ask MFA to find me a travel insurance plan that covers Martial Law, etc.
5555...BroGSK721g....I happen to know the person tat issued the advisory....and I guess tat the answer to ur question is answered below by Bro Aries3288....

I suppose tats why they mentioned COMPREHENSIVE insurance...so good points tat u guys listed out...please do check and confirm before committing to any travel insurance policy. Regardless, i do know tat even if the plan covers u still there will be certain exclusions such as u MUST NOT get involved in protest activities as injuries or loss incurred due to participation of such activity is not covered....(just like if u know a gal is HIV infected but u still choose to screw her raw and get HIV later....blame her or urself??)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aries3288 View Post
I have a AIG Travel Guard annual plan and called them one day before I travel to. Bangkok on 25 May to check since MFA had issued travel advisory. The person on the phone told me that I will be covered even if MFA issued an advisory against traveling to Thailand. However I should avoid protest sites and must not take part in any political activities in Thailand.

Those with travel insurance might want to call your insurance company to check. I did that after reading their fine prints on the policy and read their definition on "war" which was not very clear, it mentioned military control of a country.